SAOT Winter Academy 2026: Evaluation A

The announcement and organization of the SAOT Winter Academy (timelines, information provided, programme) were
1 (inadequate) 5 (excellent)

Accomodation, meals and refreshments were
1 5

The non-scientific program was
1 5

Was the SAOT Academy beneficial regarding your research?
1 5

Would you recommend your colleagues to apply for membership of the SAOT?
1 5

Please evaluate the course in which you particpated.
The Scientific Content was: (1 - uninteresting, 5 - very interesting)
1 5

Goal setting, structure and focus of the course were:(1 - not identifiable, 5 - clearly identifiable)
1 5

The degree of difficulty was: (1 - not appropriate, 5 - appropriate)
1 5

The presented content is comprehensible, there is enough time to follow and think for oneself: (1 - doesn‘t apply, 5 - applies fully)
1 5

The golden thread was always perceptible: (1 - does not apply, 5 - applies fully)
1 5

The overall quality of the course was: (1 - poor, 5 - perfect)
1 5

Please evaluate the course instructor.
The Style of presentation was: (1 - not appealing, 5 - appealing)
1 5

The instructor awaken the interest for the subject:(1 - does not apply, 5 - applies fully)
1 5

The instructor makes sure that the content is understood and react to questions: (1 - does not apply, 5 - applies fully)
1 5

The use of media (flipchart, videos, quiz...) is : (1 - not appropriate, 5 - appropriate)
1 5

Please leave comments if you want :-):